Having grown up in suburban Sydney (for the most part) trips to 'the country' were a regular occurrence.
When we couldn't make the trip out to Bathurst or Mudgee in NSW's Central West or Wangaratta in Victoria's north east, we'd inevitably end up at Warragamba Dam, south of Sydney.
We'd have a barbecue, check out the dam and play whatever ball sport we'd brought along that day.
Sometimes, for an extra treat, we'd visit the Burragorang Valley lookout.
It was never short of breathtaking - so it's sad to think that we could potentially (most likely) lose that iconic view.
Western Sydney minister Stuart Ayres has proposed raising the Warragamba Dam wall in an effort to mitigate flooding in the Hawkesbury Valley region.
Sure, it might help to reduce flood risks but it will destroy a World Heritage listed site filled with sacred Indigenous sites and endangered flora and fauna in the process.
First Nations people have been fighting this plan since it was first announced because they lost a lot of their sites when the valley was originally flooded to make room for the dam more than 60 years ago.
Now they stand to lose the rest.
The government spent just 25 days assessing the Indigenous significance of the valley, barely scratching the surface of the importance of these sites.
Wollondilly and Blue Mountains councils have even joined forces to fight the project.
But their collective cries seem to be falling on deaf ears.
The NSW government released the 8000-page Environmental Impact Statement for the dam wall proposal last month.
Mr Ayres said the document "was a significant milestone in the delivery of raising Warragamba Dam wall. It's an extensive, even exhaustive, environmental impact statement".
The project is still in its early days of approvals, but it somewhat seems like the government is ready to forge ahead.
Some people think this plan will aid Sydney's water supply - which we all know reached dangerously low levels during the recent drought.
But let's make this clear - raising the dam wall will not increase Sydney's water supply.
The capacity of the dam will not increase by one drop.
There are also other flood mitigation options available.
So why is raising the dam wall the only one being considered?
That's a 'dam' good question.
One I am sure every detractor for the project would like answered.
With the Daintree being handed back to its traditional owners in recent weeks, why are we placing such little value on a similarly vast and important site for Indigenous people in Sydney?
Surely we need to hang on to as much of this history as we can.
Because once it's gone, it's gone.
In case you are interested in filtering all the latest down to just one late afternoon read, why not sign up for The Informer newsletter?
MORE STUFF HAPPENING AROUND AUSTRALIA:
- Labor sees 'rort' pattern in regional grants program
- Farmers want payback as Coalition net zero talks near crunch time
- New airline headed for Australia as more restrictions set to ease
- Grace Tame joins TikTok dance campaign to empower young girls
- Tempted to buy a regional unit? Read this first
- 'There was sufficient time': Government lashed over Afghanistan evacuation
- Why we must let go of our busy culture
- How to lose those lockdown kilos